Preview

FARMAKOEKONOMIKA. Modern Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmacoepidemiology

Advanced search

Analysis of the dynamics and characteristics of the pharmaceutical market of homeopathic medicines in Azerbaijan

https://doi.org/10.17749/2070-4909/farmakoekonomika.2025.300

Abstract

Objective: To study the dynamics and characteristics of the market of homeopathic medicines (HMs) in Azerbaijan for the period 2019–2024.
Material and methods
. Official information of the Ministry of Health, the Tariff Council of the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Biological Medicine Clinic on the volume of HM receipts for the period specified was studied. The following key aspects were analyzed: HM product range indicators (breadth, variety, and depth); countries-producers and suppliers; the level of wholesale and retail prices for HMs. Forecasted indicators for the breadth, variety, and expected volume of homeopathic medicines for the year 2025 were calculated.

Results. Data for the 2019–2024 period demonstrated relative stability in the breadth, variety, and depth of the range of HMs in the pharmaceutical market of Azerbaijan. The forecasted breadth and variety of the HM range in 2025 was estimated at around 96 items and 408 positions, respectively. The range depth remained constant throughout the study period (p=0,928). The forecasted sales volume of HMs in 2025 reached 4.92×106 USD. The highest number of registered HMs was recorded in 2016 (effective date of registration of these drugs). Since then, the number of registrations was decreasing year by year, reaching single cases in 2023–2024. During 2019–2024, the dynamics of the most in-demand pharmaceutical form – soluble tablets – followed a non-linear trend (p=0.076). The dynamics of the market share of products supplied by the leading manufacturer Biologische Heilmittel Heel GmbH (Germany) during the study period demonstrated a nonlinear trend (p=0.994). Similarly, the trend in the market share of products supplied by Materia Medica Holding (Russian Federation) was also nonlinear; however, statistically significant differences were observed from 2019 to 2024 (p<0.001). Throughout the period under study, the HM market was dominated by products into the wholesale price range of 1.17 to 5.88 USD, and the share of these products remained largely unchanged (p=0.766). No statistically significant differences were observed in the distribution of retail price segments for HMs over the study period (p=0.882).

Conclusion. HMs have maintained their niche in the Azerbaijani market year after year, and their availability ensured through imports and an established distribution system.

About the Author

S. H. Maharramova
Azerbaijan Medical University
Azerbaijan

Sevinj H. Maharramova, PhD, Assoc. Prof. 

163 Samed Vurgun Str., Baku AZ1078 



References

1. Hoenders R., Ghelman R., Portella C., et al. A review of the WHO strategy on traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine from the perspective of academic consortia for integrative medicine and health. Front. Med. 2024; 11: 1395698. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1395698.

2. WHO traditional medicine strategy: 2014–2023. Available at: https:// iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/92455/9789241506090_eng.pdf?sequence=1 (accessed 10.10.2024).

3. WHO global report on traditional and complementary medicine 2019. Available at: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/312342 (accessed 01.06.2024).

4. Homeopathy Research Institute. Homeopathy use around the world. Available at: https://www.hri-research.org/resources/essentialevidence/use-of-homeopathy%20across-the-world/ (accessed 23.09.2024).

5. Ullman D. Exploring possible mechanisms of hormesis and homeopathy in the light of nanopharmacology and ultra-high dilutions. Dose Response. 2021; 19 (2): 15593258211022983. https://doi.org/10.1177/15593258211022983.

6. Van Wassenhoven M., Goyens M., Dorfman P., et al. Characterisation of Aqueous ultra-high homeopathic potencies: nanoparticle tracking analysis. Homeopathy. 2025; 114 (3): 146–62. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1787782.

7. Maharramova S., Süleymanova T., Mehraliyeva S. Comparative analysis of antimicrobial properties of the homeopathic compositions prepared from some medicinal plants belonging to the flora of Azerbaijan. Azerbaijan Medical Journal. 2024; 3: 128–34 (in Azerbaijani). https://doi.org/10.34921/amj.2024.3.022.

8. Maharramova S., Akhundov R.А. A new look at homeopathic medicines. In: Materials of the 5th International Scientific Congress “Modern Problems of Pharmacy”, dedicated to the 90th anniversary of the establishment of Azerbaijan Medical University and the 80th anniversary of higher pharmaceutical education in Azerbaijan. Baku; 2021: 224–9 (in Azerbaijani).

9. Zilov V.G., Mayev I.V., Karpeyev A.A., et al. Modern view on the problems of homeopathy. Journal of Postgraduate Medical Education. 2021; 3: 28–36 (in Russ.)

10. Shilovtsev A.V. On the history of the emergence and development of homeopathy. In: Social and humanitarian education and modernity: proceedings of the All-Russian National Scientific and Practical Conference Dedicated to the 70th anniversary of Doctor of Philosophy, Professor S.N. Nekrasov. Yekaterinburg: Ural State Agrarian University; 2022: 561–6 (in Russ.).

11. Parshina S.S. (Ed.) Homeopathy and modern medicine: collection of materials of the XXVI Interregional Scientific and Practical Homeopathic Conference. Saratov: Saratovsky istochnik; 2023: 41 pp. (in Russ.).

12. Arpa A.M., Merisalde B.A. Document in defense of homeopathy, prepared by the International Medical Homeopathic League (2019). In: Homeopathic yearbook – 2020. Collection of materials of the XXX Scientific and Practical Conference with International Participation. Moscow: Tekhpoligraftsentr; 2020: 131–66 (in Russ.).

13. Aleksandrov E.B. On the pseudoscientific nature of homeopathy. Priroda. 2017; 3: 80–1 (in Russ.).

14. Trofimova E.O. Marketing in pharmacy: methodology of research of the pharmaceutical market. Moscow: Yurayt; 2025: 114 pp. (in Russ.).

15. Dzhainakbaev N.T., Orakbay L.Zh., Adilkhanova A.N., et al. Guide to practical classes in biostatistics. Almaty: Kazakh-Russian Medical University; 2020: 94 pp. (in Russ.).

16. Relton C., Cooper K., Viksveen P., et al. Prevalence of homeopathy use by the general population worldwide: a systematic review. Homeopathy. 2017; 106 (2): 69–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.homp.2017.03.002.

17. Central Council for Research in Unani Medicine. Ministry of AYUSH, Government of India. Annual report 2023–2024. Available at: https://ccrum.res.in/writereaddata/UploadFile/Annual%20Report%202023-24%20-English_1869.pdf (accessed 21.01.2025).

18. Teixeira M.Z. Scientific evidence for homeopathy. Clinics. 2023; 78: 100255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinsp.2023.100255.

19. Hamre H.J., Glockmann A., von Ammon K., et al. Efficacy of homoeopathic treatment: systematic review of meta-analyses of randomised placebo-controlled homoeopathy trials for any indication. Syst Rev. 2023; 12 (1): 191. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02313-2.

20. Tala A., Plaza C. Integrative medicine in Chile: towards a more global vision of people's health. Rev Med Chil. 2023; 151 (8): 1071–7 (in Spanish). https://doi.org/10.4067/s0034-98872023000801071.

21. Belousov E.A., Zakirova L.R., Shentseva E.A., Belousova O.V. Marketing examination of drugs with homeopathic dosages in the local pharmaceutical market. Economics. Sociology. Law. 2022; 3. https://doi.org/10. 22281/2542-1697-2022-01-03-9-16.


Review

For citations:


Maharramova S.H. Analysis of the dynamics and characteristics of the pharmaceutical market of homeopathic medicines in Azerbaijan. FARMAKOEKONOMIKA. Modern Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmacoepidemiology. 2025;18(3):403-412. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17749/2070-4909/farmakoekonomika.2025.300

Views: 11


ISSN 2070-4909 (Print)
ISSN 2070-4933 (Online)