Preview

FARMAKOEKONOMIKA. Modern Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmacoepidemiology

Advanced search

Antibiotic resistance of uropathogens in patients with nephrolithiasis and concomitant coronary heart disease

https://doi.org/10.17749/2070-4909/farmakoekonomika.2022.134

Abstract

Objective: to identify the main causative agents of chronic calculous pyelonephritis and determine their antibiotic resistance in patients with nephrolithiasis combined with coronary heart disease (CHD).

Material and methods. A retrospective case-control study included 181 patients aged 57 to 82 years old who were treated at the urological center of branch no. 1 of Burdenko Main Military Clinical Hospital in 2014–2019. All patients long-term suffered from urolithiasis complicated by chronic calculus pyelonephritis in combination with CHD. Clinically significant results of bacteriological urine examinations (CFU≥103) were analyzed. The midstream urine specimen cultivation was performed sectorally on Endo agar. The minimum suppressive concentration of the test antibacterial preparations for each of the detected microorganisms was determined by dilution on a dense Müller–Hinton agar culture medium (BBL, USA). The results were processed using the Shapiro–Wilk, Kolmogorov–Smirnov, and χ2 Pirson criteria. The values of p≤0,05 were considered as statistically significant.

Results. Specimen culturing revealed Escherichia coli – 24.8%, Klebsiella pneumoniae – 18.3%, Pseudomanas aeruginosa – 11%. Staphylococcus spp., and Enterococcus spp. were most important among gram-positive pathogens (total 26.6% of cases). The sensitivity of the detected infectious agents to basic antibacterial drugs turned out to be sharply reduced. It is noteworthy that 65% of P. aeruginosa strains were sensitive to meropenem.

Conclusion. In patients with recurrent urolithiasis combined with CHD, the proportion of gram-positive coccas was increased on the background of calculous pyelonephritis with a simultaneous decrease in the proportion of poly-resistant gram-negative infectious agents (nosocomial strains of E. coli and K. pneumoniae).

About the Authors

R. V. Royuk
Burdenko Main Military Clinical Hospital, branch no. 1 (7th Central Military Clinical Aviation Hospital)
Russian Federation

Ruslan V. Royuk – MD, PhD, Head of Urological Department

17 Poperechnyy Prosek, Moscow 107014, Russia



S. K. Yarovoy
Lopatkin Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology – branch of National Medical Research Center of Radiology
Russian Federation

Sergey K. Yarovoy – Dr. Med. Sc., Chief Researcher, Clinical Pharmacologist

51 3rd Parkovaya Str., Moscow 105425



I. B. Shikina
Central Research Institute of Healthcare Organization and Informatization
Russian Federation

Irina B. Shikina – Dr. Med. Sc., Associate Professor, Chief Researcher, Department of Scientific Foundations of Health Organization

11 Dobrolyubov Str., Moscow 127254

Scopus Author ID: 6602992806



References

1. Marien T., Mass A.Y., Shah O. Antimicrobial resistance patterns in cases of obstructive pyelonephritis secondary to stones. Urology. 2015; 85 (1): 64–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2014.10.007.

2. Kulchenko N.G., Chibisov S.M., Eremina I.Z., et al. Dinamic changes of the microflora sensitivity to antibiotics in patients with chronic calculous pyelonephritis. Res J Pharm Technol. 2017; 10 (3): 683–6. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-360X.2017.00127.5.

3. Petrov V.I., Vinarov A.Z., Vekilyan M.A., Kulchenko N.G. Changes in the structure of pathogens of calculous pyelonephritis complicated with diabetes mellitus type II, in the hospital urology of the city of Volgograd. Urologiia. 2016; 4: 58–62 (in Russ.).

4. Kaprin A.D. Gafanov R.A. Milenin K.N. Pyelonephritis: clinics, diagnosis and treatment. Lechaschi vrach. 2002; 11: 16–9 (in Russ.).

5. Apolikhin O.I., Sivkov A.V., Moskaleva N.G., et al. Analysis of the uronephrological morbidity and mortality in the Russian Federation during the 10-year period (2002–2012) according to the official statistics. Experimental & Clinical Urology. 2014; 2: 4–13 (in Russ.).

6. EAU. Guidelines. Urological infections. Available at: https://uroweb.org/guidelines/urological-infections/chapter/the-guideline (accessed 12.08.2022).

7. Kruglyakova L.V., Velichko D.N., Sulima M.V., et al. Complications of antibacterial therapy of genitourinary organs infectious diseases. In: Topical issues of urology. Materials of the Scientific and Practical Conference of Urologists of the Far East. Blagoveshchensk–Heihe (China), September 19-21, 2013. Blagoveshchensk; 2013: 81–8 (in Russ.).

8. Kulchenko N.G., Vekilyan M.A. Analysis of antibiotic sensitivity of E. coli in patients with chronic calculous pyelonephritis. RUDN Journal of Medicine. 2016; 3: 125–31 (in Russ.).

9. Shikina I.B. Ensuring the safety of elderly and senile patients in a hospital setting. Problems of Social Hygiene, Public Health and History of Medicine, Russian Journal. 2007; 6: 44–45 (in Russ.).

10. Hamasuna R., Takahashi S., Nagae H., et al. Obstructive pyelonephrit as a result of urolithiasis in Japan: diagnosis, treatment and prognosis. Int J Urol. 2015; 22 (3): 294–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.12666.

11. Gadzhieva Z.K. Features of the approach to the diagnosis and treatment of recurrent infections of the lower urinary tract. Urologiia. 2013; 3: 84–91 (in Russ.).

12. Galkin V.V., Malev I.V., Dovgan E.V., et al. Efficacy and safety of cefixim and ciprofloxacin in acute cystitis (a multicenter randomized trial). Urologiia. 2011; 1: 13–6 (in Russ.).

13. Palagin I.S., Sukhorukova M.V., Dekhnich A.V., et al. Complicated community-acquired urinary tract infections in adult patients in Russia. Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2014; 16 (1): 39–56 (in Russ.).

14. Perepanova T.S. The 2015 Federal Clinical Guidelines for antimicrobial therapy and prevention of infections of the kidney, urinary tract, and male genitals. Terapevticheskii arkhiv. 2016; 88 (4): 100–4 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/terarkh2016884100-104.

15. Slesarevskaya M.N., Spiridonova A.A., Krasnova M.V., et al. Microbiological monitoring of causative agents of nosocomial infection in the urological clinic. Urology Reports (St.-Petersburg). 2020; 10 (4): 293–300 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17816/uroved54607.

16. Palagin I.S., Sukhorukova M.V., Dekhnich A.V., et al. Antimicrobial resistance of pathogens causing community-acquired urinary tract infections in Russia: results of the multicenter study “DARMIS-2018”. Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2019; 21 (2): 134–46 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.36488/cmac.2019.2.134-146.

17. Romanov A.V., Dekhnich A.V., Sukhorukova M.V., et al. Antimicrobial resistance of nosocomial Staphylococcus aureus isolates in Russia: results of multicenter epidemiological study “MARATHON” 2013–2014. Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2017; 19 (1): 57–62 (in Russ.).

18. Service for Supervision of Consumer Rights Protection and Human Well-Being. MU 4.2.2039—05 “Technique of collecting and transporting biomaterials to microbiological laboratories”. Available at: https://www.rospotrebnadzor.ru/documents/details.php?ELEMENT_ID=4750 (in Russ.) (accessed 12.08.2022).

19. Sycheva M.V., Kartashova O.L., Shchepitova N.E., Safronov Al.A. Antibiotic resistance of Enterococci isolated from healthy humans and patients with various pathologies. Antibiotics and Chemotherapy. 2016; 61 (7-8): 27–32 (in Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Royuk R.V., Yarovoy S.K., Shikina I.B. Antibiotic resistance of uropathogens in patients with nephrolithiasis and concomitant coronary heart disease. FARMAKOEKONOMIKA. Modern Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmacoepidemiology. 2022;15(4):453-462. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17749/2070-4909/farmakoekonomika.2022.134

Views: 1010


ISSN 2070-4909 (Print)
ISSN 2070-4933 (Online)