Preview

FARMAKOEKONOMIKA. Modern Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmacoepidemiology

Advanced search

Budget impact analysis of acalabrutinib plus venetoclax in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

https://doi.org/10.17749/2070-4909/farmakoekonomika.2026.357

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the budget impact of a fixed-duration combination (FC) “acalabrutinib + venetoclax” regimen for treatmentnaive adults with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), unmutated IGHV, and absence of del(17p) or mutations in TP53 in the Russian Federation.
Material and methods. A deterministic, payer-perspective model was developed over one- and three-year horizons. The analysis focused on drug acquisition costs (national price registry, +10% value added tax), with label-based dosing. The standard therapy included Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitors (acalabrutinib, ibrutinib, or zanubrutinib), or FCs “venetoclax + obinutuzumab” and “ibrutinib + venetoclax”. The simulated scenario assumed a 50% substitution of “ibrutinib + venetoclax” by “acalabrutinib + venetoclax” over three years. A one way sensitivity analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of variations in drug prices (±20%), population size (±20%), and uptake of “acalabrutinib + venetoclax” (–20% to complete substitution).
Results. The target population included 697 patients. Per-patient costs of FCs were as follows: 9,124,560 rubles for “acalabrutinib + venetoclax”; 10,375,643 rubles for “ibrutinib + venetoclax”. For the total cohort, total three-year expenditures amounted to 8,404.5 million rubles in the current practice versus 8,322.0 million rubles with FC “acalabrutinib + venetoclax”, i.e., budget savings came to 82.5 million rubles. These savings are driven by the lower cost for a course of “acalabrutinib + venetoclax” compared to “ibrutinib + venetoclax”. Sensitivity analyses confirmed robustness: although results were most sensitive to the prices of acalabrutinib and ibrutinib, savings persisted across tested ranges; higher uptake of “acalabrutinib + venetoclax” further increased budget savings.
Conclusions. Implementing the FC “acalabrutinib + venetoclax” for the first-line treatment of CLL patients with unmutated IGHV and no TP53 aberrations reduces the healthcare budget burden compared to “ibrutinib + venetoclax”, yielding approximately 82.5 million rubles in savings over three years based on drug acquisition costs.

About the Authors

S. V. Nedogoda
Volgograd State Medical University
Russian Federation

Sergey V. Nedogoda, Dr. Med. Sci., Prof.

WoS ResearcherID: O-4656-2014. Scopus Author ID: 6507198479

1 Pavshikh Bortsov Sq., Volgograd 400066



A. S. Salasyuk
Volgograd State Medical University
Russian Federation

Alla S. Salasyuk, Dr. Med. Sci., Prof.

WoS ResearcherID: D-1795-2016. Scopus Author ID: 55807712600

1 Pavshikh Bortsov Sq., Volgograd 400066



I. N. Barykina
Volgograd State Medical University
Russian Federation

Irina N. Barykina, PhD, Assoc. Prof.

WoS ResearcherID: E-2791-2016. Scopus Author ID: 55673000500

1 Pavshikh Bortsov Sq., Volgograd 400066



V. O. Lutova
Volgograd State Medical University
Russian Federation

Viktoria O. Lutova, PhD, Assoc. Prof.

WoS ResearcherID: D-1884-2016. Scopus Author ID: 57189647005

1 Pavshikh Bortsov Sq., Volgograd 400066



E. A. Popova
Volgograd State Medical University
Russian Federation

Ekaterina A. Popova, PhD, Assoc. Prof.

1 Pavshikh Bortsov Sq., Volgograd 400066



References

1. Kaprin A.D., Starinsky V.V., Shakhzadova A.O., Zolotarev N.Yu. Malignant neoplasms in Russia in 2024 (incidence). Мoscow: Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – branch of National MedicalResearch Center for Radiology; 2025: 178 pp. (in Russ.).

2. Rubricator of Clinical Diseases. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia / small lymphocyte lymphoma. 2024. Available at: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/view-cr/134_2 (in Russ.) (accessed 02.11.2025).

3. Nedogoda S.V., Salasyuk A.S., Barykina I.N., et al. Pharmacoeconomic analysis of acalabrutinib in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Journal of Modern Oncology. 2021; 23 (4): 612–20 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.26442/18151434.2021.4.201339.

4. Unified Register of Registered Medicines of the Eurasian Economic Union. Calquence®. Available at: https://pharma.eaeunion.org/pharma/registers/26/ru/register/registered-medicinal-products/63ae8bb6fb44f154421a3367 (in Russ.) (accessed 02.11.2025).

5. Brown J.R., Seymour J.F., Jurczak W., et al. Fixed-duration acalabrutinib combinations in untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2025; 392 (8): 748–62. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2409804.

6. Omelyanovsky V.V., Avxentyeva M.V., Sura M.V., et al. Methodological recommendations for budget impact analysis within the framework of the implementating the program of state guarantees for the free provision of medical care to citizens (new edition). Мoscow: Center for Healthcare Quality Assessment and Control; 2018: 40 pp. (in Russ.).

7. Unified Register of Registered Medicines of the Eurasian Economic Union. Venclexta®. Available at: https://pharma.eaeunion.org/pharma/registers/26/ru/register/registered-medicinal-products/64ddd415fb44f13b9518d78e (in Russ.) (accessed 02.11.2025).

8. Unified Register of Registered Medicines of the Eurasian Economic Union. Imbruvica®. Available at: https://pharma.eaeunion.org/pharma/registers/26/ru/register/registered-medicinal-products/66cc5d8830dcf85cade65715 (in Russ.) (accessed 02.11.2025).

9. Unified Register of Registered Medicines of the Eurasian Economic Union. Brukinsa®. Available at: https://pharma.eaeunion.org/pharma/registers/26/ru/register/registered-medicinal-products/685d004a30dcf8016b7cabe5 (in Russ.) (accessed 02.11.2025).

10. Unified Register of Registered Medicines of the Eurasian Economic Union. Gazyva®. Available at: https://pharma.eaeunion.org/pharma/registers/26/ru/register/registered-medicinal-products/675166e530dcf8c882a5348f (in Russ.) (accessed 02.11.2025).


What is already known about thе subject?

 Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most common adult leukemia. Patients with unmutated IGHV and without del(17p) or mutations in TP53 represent a higher-risk subgroup that derives limited benefit from conventional chemoimmunotherapy

 According to current Russian guidelines, first-line therapy for this cohort relies on Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ibrutinib, acalabrutinib, and zanubrutinib) and fixed-duration combinations (FСs) based on venetoclax

 Given limited budgets, it is essential to assess the economic impact of introducing new first-line regimens

What are the new findings?

 FC “acalabrutinib + venetoclax” reduces per-patient drug costs to 9,124,560 rubles compared to 10,375,643 rubles for FC “ibrutinib + venetoclax” (a 12.1% reduction)

 Replacing 50% of FC “ibrutinib + venetoclax” with FC “acalabrutinib + venetoclax” in a target population of 697 patients reduces total pharma­ceutical expenditures from 8,404.5 million rubles to 8,322.0 million rubles over three years, yielding budget savings of 82.5 million rubles

 One-way sensitivity analyses (±20% prices; ±20% population; uptake from –20% to complete substitution) confirm the robustness of savings, which are most sensitive to the prices of acalabrutinib and ibrutinib. Higher uptake of FC “acalabrutinib + venetoclax” increases savings

How might it impact the clinical practice in the foreseeable future?

 Incorporating FC “acalabrutinib + venetoclax” into first-line therapy for adults with unmutated IGHV and no TP53 aberrations can reduce the healthcare budget burden compared with FC “ibrutinib + venetoclax”

Review

For citations:


Nedogoda S.V., Salasyuk A.S., Barykina I.N., Lutova V.O., Popova E.A. Budget impact analysis of acalabrutinib plus venetoclax in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. FARMAKOEKONOMIKA. Modern Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmacoepidemiology. 2026;1(19):16-23. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17749/2070-4909/farmakoekonomika.2026.357

Views: 450

JATS XML

ISSN 2070-4909 (Print)
ISSN 2070-4933 (Online)