Pharmacoepidemiology of anxiolytics in the Russian Federation
https://doi.org/10.17749/2070-4909/farmakoekonomika.2025.305
Abstract
Objective: To assess the structure and volume of anxiolytic consumption in the Russian Federation in 2019–2024.
Material and methods. Data on sales of medicines belonging to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification class N05B (anxiolytics) contained in the IQVIA database and selected to treat patients with neurotic stress-related and somatoform disorders according to the current Russian clinical guidelines were derived. The study period of 2019–2024 covered such drugs as diazepam, alprazolam, lorazepam, bromdihydrochlorophenylbenzodiazepine, tofizopam, fabomotizole, etifoxine, buspirone, and hydroxyzine. Consumption was assessed at defined daily doses (DDDs) in each year of observation. The number of DDDs per 1000 individuals per day was calculated. For drugs without specified DDDs, consumption was calculated based on the absolute value sold in rubles in each year of the study.
Results. During the 2019–2024 period, an almost twofold increase in the sales of anxiolytics was noted: from 43 million DDDs in 2019 to 77.5 million DDDs in 2024. This increase was primarily attributed to a 2.5-fold increase in the sales of hydroxyzine (to 44.1 million DDDs in 2024) and a twofold increase in the sales of buspirone (to 2.3 million in 2024). The estimated consumption per 1000 individuals per day increased from 0.8 DDDs in 2019 to 1.45 DDDs in 2024. The sales of benzodiazepines decreased from 24.4% in 2019 to 10.9% in 2024. Among the anxiolytics without specified DDDs, fabomotizol ranked first in terms of acquisition costs, amounting to 2.1 billion rubles in 2019 and 3.2 billion rubles in 2024. The sales of bromodihydrochlorophenylbenzodiazepine decreased 2.7 times during the study period: from 806 million rubles in 2019 to 292 million rubles in 2024.
Conclusions. Due to the reduction in benzodiazepines consumption, the risks of prescribing other classes of psychotropic drugs, such as antipsychotics including off-label indications, are high. This requires careful monitoring of adverse drug reactions, including those associated with low compliance.
About the Authors
Yu. M. GomonRussian Federation
Yulia М. Gomon, Dr. Sci. Med., Prof.
WoS ResearcherID: O-9443- 2018
Scopus Author ID: 57217520417
6-8 Lev Tolstoy Str., Saint Petersburg 197022
A. S. Kolbin
Russian Federation
Alexey S. Kolbin, Dr. Sci. Med., Prof.
WoS ResearcherID: G-5537- 2015
Scopus Author ID: 19836020100
6-8 Lev Tolstoy Str., Saint Petersburg 197022
2 Mendeleevskaya Line, Saint Petersburg 199034
V. A. Lavrova
Russian Federation
Viktoria A. Lavrova, PhD
6-8 Lev Tolstoy Str., Saint Petersburg 197022
N. G. Neznanov
Russian Federation
Nikolay G. Neznanov, Dr. Sci. Med., Prof.
6-8 Lev Tolstoy Str., Saint Petersburg 197022
3 Bekhterev Str., Saint Petersburg 192019
D. N. Nuriakhmitova
Russian Federation
Diana N. Nuriakhmitova
6-8 Lev Tolstoy Str., Saint Petersburg 197022
References
1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition: DSM-5. Arlington: American Psychiatric Association; 2013: 991 pp. https://doi/book/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596.
2. GBD 2019 Mental Disorders Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of 12 mental disorders in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Psychiatry. 2022; 9 (2): 137–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00395-3.
3. Griebel G., Holmes A. 50 years of hurdles and hope in anxiolytic drug discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2013; 12 (9): 667–87. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd4075.
4. Garakani A., Murrough J.W., Freire R.C., et al. Pharmacotherapy of anxiety disorders: current and emerging treatment options. Front Psychiatry. 2020; 11: 1412. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.595584.
5. Anxiety-phobic disorders. Clinical guidelines. 2024. Available at: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/preview-cr/455_3 (in Russ.) (accessed 15.03.2025).
6. Panic disorder. Clinical guidelines. 2024. Available at: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/preview-cr/456_3 (in Russ.) (accessed 15.03.2025).
7. Post-traumatic stress disorder. Clinical guidelines. 2023. Available at: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/preview-cr/753_1 (in Russ.) (accessed 15.03.2025).
8. Obsessive-compulsive disorder. Clinical guidelines. 2025. Available at: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/preview-cr/650_2 (in Russ.) (accessed 29.04.2025).
9. Särkilä H., Taipale H., Tanskanen A., et al. Characteristics of highdose benzodiazepine use: nationwide cohort study on new benzodiazepine users with 5-year follow-up. BJPsych Open. 2024; 10 (5): e158. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2024.780.
10. Højlund M., Gudmundsson L.S., Andersen J.H., et al. Use of benzodiazepines and benzodiazepine-related drugs in the Nordic countries between 2000 and 2020. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2023; 132 (1): 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcpt.13811.
11. Barboza Zanetti M.O., Dos Santos I., Durante J.C., et al. Consumption patterns and factors associated with inappropriate prescribing of benzodiazepines in Primary Health Care settings. PLoS One. 2024; 19 (9): e0309984. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0309984.
12. Agarwal S.D., Landon B.E. Patterns in outpatient benzodiazepine prescribing in the United States. JAMA Netwo Open. 2019; 2 (1): e187399-e. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.7399.
13. Balon R., Starcevic V. Role of benzodiazepines in anxiety disorders. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2020; 1191: 367–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9705-0_20.
14. Domschke K., Seuling P.D., Schiele M.A., et al. The definition of treatment resistance in anxiety disorders: a Delphi method-based consensus guideline. World Psychiatry. 2024; 23 (1): 113–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.21177.
15. Taylor S., Abramowitz J.S., McKay D. Non-adherence and nonresponse in the treatment of anxiety disorders. J Anxiety Disord. 2012; 26 (5): 583–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2012.02.010.
16. Springer K.S., Levy H.C., Tolin D.F. Remission in CBT for adult anxiety disorders: a meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2018; 61: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2018.03.002.
17. Solis E.C., van Hemert A.M., Carlier I.V.E., et al. The 9-year clinical course of depressive and anxiety disorders: new NESDA findings. J Affect Disord. 2021; 295: 1269–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2021.08.108.
18. WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology. International language for drug utilization research. Available at: https:// atcddd.fhi.no/ (accessed 03.03.2025).
19. Gomon Yu.M., Kolbin A.S., Lavrova V.A., Neznanov N.G. Pharmacoepidemiology of antidepressants in the Russian Federation. Real-World Data & Evidence. 2025; 5 (1): 49–58 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10. 37489/2782-3784-myrwd-068.
20. Kurko T., Saastamoinen L.K., Tuulio-Henriksson A., et al. Trends in the long-term use of benzodiazepine anxiolytics and hypnotics: a national register study for 2006 to 2014. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2018; 27 (6): 674–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.4551.
21. Tähkäpää S.M., Saastamoinen L., Airaksinen M., et al. Decreasing trend in the use and long-term use of benzodiazepines among young adults. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2018; 28 (4): 279–84. https://doi.org/10.1089/cap.2017.0140.
22. Dahlén E., Bardage C., Tuvendal P., Ljung R. New users of anxiolytics and sedatives in Sweden-Drug type, doses, prescribers' characteristics, and psychiatric comorbidity in more than 750,000 patients. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2024; 33 (1): e1998. https://doi. org/10.1002/mpr.1998.
23. Baandrup L., Kruse M. Incident users of antipsychotics: who are they and how do they fare? Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2016; 51 (4): 505–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-015-1129-8.
24. Højlund M., Pottegård A., Johnsen E., et al. Trends in utilization and dosing of antipsychotic drugs in Scandinavia: comparison of 2006 and 2016. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019; 85 (7): 1598–606. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.13945.
25. Højlund M., Rasmussen L., Olesen M., et al. Who prescribes quetiapine in Denmark? Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2022; 10 (9): 4224–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.15388.
26. Zheng D., Brett J., Daniels B., et al. Potentially inappropriate benzodiazepine use in Australian adults: a population-based study (2014–2017). Drug Alcohol Rev. 2020; 39 (5): 575–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/dar.13086.
27. Taipale H., Sarkila H., Tanskanen A., et al. Incidence of and characteristics associated with long-term benzodiazepine use in Finland. JAMA Netw Open. 2020; 3 (10): e2019029. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.19029.
28. Panes A., Pariente A., Bénard-Laribière A., et al. Use of benzodiazepines and z-drugs not compliant with guidelines and associated factors: a population-based study. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2020; 270 (1): 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-018-0966-3.
29. Soeiro T., Pradel V., Lapeyre-Mestre M., Micallef J. Systematic assessment of non-medical use of prescription drugs using doctorshopping indicators: a nation-wide, repeated cross-sectional study. Addiction. 2023; 118 (10): 1984–993. https://doi.org/10.1111/add. 16261.
Review
For citations:
Gomon Yu.M., Kolbin A.S., Lavrova V.A., Neznanov N.G., Nuriakhmitova D.N. Pharmacoepidemiology of anxiolytics in the Russian Federation. FARMAKOEKONOMIKA. Modern Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmacoepidemiology. 2025;18(3):321-329. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17749/2070-4909/farmakoekonomika.2025.305

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.