Preview

FARMAKOEKONOMIKA. Modern Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmacoepidemiology

Advanced search

Approaches to determining the cost of laboratory tests

https://doi.org/10.17749/2070-4909/farmakoekonomika.2024.245

Abstract

Background. Determining the cost of laboratory tests is a significant factor in the context of economic analysis and management of clinical diagnostic laboratories. Information about costs allows medical organizations to plan operational activities more efficiently, optimize resource utilization, and exercise control over expenditures. These measures are aimed at improving the financial position and enhancing the operational efficiency of the laboratories.

Objective: to review various methods for calculating the cost of laboratory tests.

Material and methods. The study included the collection and analysis of publications on calculating cost of laboratory tests, determining their prime cost in PubMed/MEDLINE and Google Scholar databases, as well as in Google and Yandex search engines for similar “cost laboratory test” query. The regulatory documents of the Russian Federation in this area were considered.

Results. For calculating the prime cost of laboratory tests such methods as direct costing, regulatory prime costing, total prime costing, activity-based costing (ABC), standard costing, costing for base service, department costing, cost-volume analysis are used. The ABC and standard cost methods provide the most accurate assessment of the impact of various factors.

Conclusion. The approaches established by regulatory documents do not contradict each other and represent the implementation of total costing method. At the same time, a medical organization may use other methods for calculating the cost of laboratory tests, depending on the objectives of the analysis, the specifics of the laboratory and the cost accounting method adopted in accounting policy, the management accounting system.

About the Authors

I. I. Khayrullin
Pirogov City Clinical Hospital No. 1; Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional Education
Russian Federation

Ildar I. Khayrullin – MD, PhD, Chief Physician, Pirogov City Clinical Hospital No. 1; Professor, Chair of Healthcare Organization and Public Health with a Course in Health Technology Assessment, Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional Education

8 Leninsky Ave., Moscow 119049

2/1 bldg 1 Barrikadnaya Str., Moscow 123242



V. V. Omelyanovskiy
Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional Education; Center for Healthcare Quality Assessment and Control; Financial Research Institute; Semashko National Research Institute of Public Health
Russian Federation

Vitaliy V. Omelyanovskiy – Dr. Med. Sc., Professor, Chief of Chair of Healthcare Organization and Public Health with a Course in Health Technology Assessment, Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional Education; Director General, Center for Healthcare Quality Assessment and Control; Head of Health Finance Center, Financial Research Institute; Chief Researcher, Department of Economic Research in Healthcare, Semashko National Research Institute of Public Health

WoS ResearcherID: P-6911-2018

Scopus Author ID: 6507287753

2/1 bldg 1 Barrikadnaya Str., Moscow 123242

10/5 Khokhlovskiy Passage, Moscow 109028

3/2 Nastasyinskiy Passage, Moscow 127006

12 bldg 1 Vorontsovo Pole Str., Moscow 105064



R. V. Gostishchev
Pirogov City Clinical Hospital No. 1; Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional Education
Russian Federation

Roman V. Gostishchev – MD, PhD, Deputy Chief Physician for Organizational and Methodological Work, Pirogov City Clinical Hospital No. 1; Associate Professor, Chair of Healthcare Organization and Public Health with a Course in Health Technology Assessment, Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional Education

8 Leninsky Ave., Moscow 119049

2/1 bldg 1 Barrikadnaya Str., Moscow 123242



O. A. Sukhorukikh
Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional Education; Center for Healthcare Quality Assessment and Control
Russian Federation

Olga A. Sukhorukikh – Assisitant Professor, Chair of Healthcare Organization and Public Health with a Course in Health Technology Assessment, Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional Education; Advisor to Director, Center for Healthcare Quality Assessment and Control

Scopus Author ID: 57201486113

2/1 bldg 1 Barrikadnaya Str., Moscow 123242

10/5 Khokhlovskiy Passage, Moscow 109028



S. A. Kovaleva
Center for Healthcare Quality Assessment and Control; Financial Research Institute
Russian Federation

Svetlana A. Kovaleva – Head of Department of Health Resource Analysis, Center for Healthcare Quality Assessment and Control; Senior Researcher, Health Finance Center, Financial Research Institute

10/5 Khokhlovskiy Passage, Moscow 109028

3/2 Nastasyinskiy Passage, Moscow 127006



B. G. Gorodetsky
Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional Education; Unimed Laboratories JSC
Russian Federation

Boris G. Gorodetsky – Assisitant Professor, Chair of Healthcare Organization and Public Health with a Course in Health Technology Assessment, Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional Education; Chief Operating Officer, Unimed Laboratories JSC

2/1 bldg 1 Barrikadnaya Str., Moscow 123242

4 4th Dobryninskiy Passage, Moscow 119049



References

1. Strengthening clinical laboratories. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/csels/dls/strengthening-clinical-labs.html (accessed 23.10.2023).

2. Bogavac-Stanojevic N., Jelic-Ivanovic Z. The cost-effective laboratory: implementation of economic evaluation of laboratory testing. J Med Biochem. 2017; 36 (3): 238–42. https://doi.org/10.1515/jomb-2017-0036.

3. Rohr U.P., Binder C., Dieterle T., et al. The value of in vitro diagnostic testing in medical practice: a status report. PloS One. 2016; 11 (3): e0149856. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149856.

4. Kishkun A.A., Arsenin S.L. The organizational aspects of laboratory diagnostics of acute conditions: a lecture. Klinicheskaya laboratornaya diagnostika / Clinical Laboratory Diagnostics. 2012; 1: 19–27 (in Russ.).

5. Kishkun A.A. Clinical laboratory diagnostics. Мoscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2021: 720 pp. (in Russian).

6. Mayer M. Laboratory cost control and financial management software. Clin Chim Acta. 1998; 270 (1): 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-8981(97)00235-0.

7. Fedorenko A.S., Burbello A.T., Gaikova L.B., et al. Optimization of laboratory support costs in a multidisciplinary hospital: possible solutions. Emphasis on the medical information system. Kachestvennaya klinicheskaya praktika / Good Clinical Practice. 2022; 4: 24–37 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.37489/2588-0519-2022-4-24-37.

8. Tarasenko A.S. Factors of efficiency of medical laboratories. Ekonomika i sotsium / Economy and Society. 2021; 12-2: 599–602 (in Russ.).

9. Zolotarev P.N., Cherkasov S.N. Current state of clinical laboratory diagnostics (literature review). University Proceedings. Volga Region. Medical Sciences. 2018; 4: 173–90 (in Russ.).

10. Ivanetz N.V. The development of management of clinical laboratory. Problems of Social Hygiene, Public Health and History of Medicine. 2012; 6: 38–40 (in Russ.).

11. Maslova T.S. Accounting in budgetary institutions. Moscow: Magistr; 2022: 480 pp. (in Russ.).

12. Ivoylov O.O. The cost structure of the medical laboratory. Ways to save money: the balance of quality, TOT and price of laboratory research. Presentation of the report. Online conference on the MS Team platform (November 21, 2020) (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.24723.40482.

13. Ivoylov O.O., Kochetov A.G. A method for analyzing the typical structure of direct costs in the cost of a laboratory test. Klinicheskaya laboratornaya diagnostika / Clinical Laboratory Diagnostics. 2021; 66 (3): 187–92 (in Russ.).

14. Bailey R.M., Tierney Jr. T.M. Costs, service differences, and prices in private clinical laboratories. Milbank Mem Fund Q Health and Soc. 1974; 52 (3): 265–89.

15. Plebani M. The detection and prevention of errors in laboratory medicine. Ann Clin Biochem. 2010; 47 (Pt. 2): 101–10. https://doi.org/10.1258/acb.2009.009222.

16. Hardwick D.F., Morrison J.I. Applications of economic analysis to the clinical laboratory. In: Zinder O. (Ed.) Optimal use of the clinical laboratory. NY: Karger; 1986: 1–9.

17. Ivoylov O.O., Kochetov A.G., Lyang O.V., Libon K. Cost analysis as the basis for management decisions in automation of enzyme immunoassays for HIV infection. HIV Infection and Immunosuppressive Disorders. 2022; 14 (1): 78–89 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.22328/2077-9828-2022-14-1-78-89.

18. Eker P. Direct cost analysis for 32,783 samples with preanalytical phase errors. North Clin Istanb. 2022; 9 (4): 391–400. https://doi.org/10.14744/nci.2022.73555.

19. Krieg A.F., Israel M., Fink R., Shearer L.K. An approach to cost analysis of clinical laboratory services. Am J Clin Pathol. 1978; 69 (5): 525–36. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/69.5.525.

20. Buchner D.S., Hynes W.M. Cost accounting in the clinical laboratory. In: Lewandrowski K. (Ed.). Clinical chemistry: laboratory management and clinical correlations. 1st ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Williams; 2002: 70–80.

21. Travers E.M. Laboratory manager’s financial handbook. Cost accounting: the road map to financial success. Clin Lab Manage Rev. 1996; 10 (3): 265–85.

22. Meshkani Z., Nejad S.M.M., Moghaddam N.M., et al. Analysis of cost price and net profit of laboratory: case study of Iran. Int J Manag Account Econ. 2017; 4 (10): 1063–73.

23. Ma I., Lau C.K., Ramdas Z., et al. Estimated costs of 51 commonly ordered laboratory tests in Canada. Clin Biochem. 2019; 65: 58–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2018.12.013.

24. France N., Francis G., Lawrence S., Sacks S. Costing counting and comparability: aspects of performance measurement in a pathology laboratory. Pacific Account Rev. 2002; 14 (2): 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb037965.

25. Finkler S.A., Ward D.M. Issues in cost accounting for health care organizations. Jones & Bartlett Learning; 1999: 422 pp.

26. Tuckett C.W. A method for laboratory procedure cost analysis. Lab Med. 1977; 8 (6): 18–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/labmed/8.6.18.

27. Cost-per-test analysis for the small lab. The Free Library. Available at: https://www.thefreelibrary.com/Cost-per-test+analysis+for+the+sm all+lab.-a017152119 (accessed 23.10.2023).

28. Declerck B., Swaak M., Martin M., Kesteloot K. Activity-based cost analysis of laboratory tests in clinical chemistry. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2021; 59 (8): 1369–75. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2020-1849.

29. Brauburger K., Hume A.J., Mühlberger E., Olejnik J. Forty-five years of Marburg virus research. Viruses. 2012; 4 (10): 1878–927. https://doi.org/10.3390/v4101878.

30. Aujirapongpan S., Promma W., Theinsathid P., et al. The application of activity-based costing for public hospital sector sustainability. J Southwest Jiaotong University. 2020; 55 (5). https://doi.org/10.35741/issn.0258-2724.55.5.32.

31. Mouseli A., Barouni M., Amiresmaili M., et al. Cost-price estimation of clinical laboratory services based on activity-based costing: a case study from a developing country. Electron Physician. 2017; 9 (4): 4077– 83. https://doi.org/10.19082/4077.

32. Baxendale S.J., Raju P.S. Using ABC to enhance throughput accounting: a strategic perspective. Cost Management. 2004; January/ February: 31–8.

33. Martin J.R. Management accounting: concepts, techniques & controversial issues. Chapter 7: Activity based product costing. Available at: https://maaw.info/Chapter7.htm (accessed 23.10.2023).

34. Stammerjohan W.W. Better information through the marriage of ABC and traditional standard costing techniques. Management Accounting Quarterly. 2001; Fall: 15–21. 35. Kee R.C. Implementing cost-volume-profit analysis using an activity-based costing system. Advances in Management Accounting. 2001; 10: 77–94.

35. Su B.G., Chen S.F., Yeh S.H., et al. Cost evaluation of clinical laboratory in Taiwan’s National Health System by using activity-based costing. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2016; 54 (11): 1753–58. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2016-0193.

36. Baker J.J. Activity-based costing and activity-based management for health care. Aspen Pub.; 1998: 385 pp.

37. Adane K., Abiy Z., Desta K. The revenue generated from clinical chemistry and hematology laboratory services as determined using activity-based costing (ABC) model. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2015; 13: 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-015-0047-7.

38. Siamoglou S., Karamperis K., Mitropoulou C., Patrinos G.P. Costing methods as a means to measure the costs of pharmacogenomics testing. J Appl Lab Med. 2020; 5 (5): 1005–16. https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfaa113.

39. Roszita I., Nur A.M., Zafirah A.R.S.A., Aljunid S.M. Estimation of cost of diagnostic laboratory services using activity based costing (ABC) for implementation of Malaysia diagnosis related group (MY-DRG®) in teaching hospital. Malaysian J Publ Health Med. 2017; 17 (2): 1–8.

40. Brezmes M., Ochoa C., Eiros J. Cost analysis in a clinical microbiology laboratory. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2002; 21: 582–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-002-0776-3.

41. NCCLS. Basic cost accounting for clinical services; approved guideline. Available at: https://webstore.ansi.org/preview-pages/clsi/preview_gp11a.pdf (accessed 23.10.2023).

42. Charuruks N., Chamnanpai S., Seublinvog T. Cost analysis of laboratory tests: a study of the central laboratory of King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital. J Med Assoc Thai. 2004; 87 (8): 955–63.

43. Broughton P.M., Woodford F.P. Benefits of costing in the clinical laboratory. J Clin Pathol. 1983; 36 (9): 1028–35. https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.36.9.1028.

44. Jegers M., Edbrooke D.L., Hibbert C.L., et al. Definitions and methods of cost assessment: an intensivist's guide. Intensive Care Med. 2002; 28 (6): 680–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-002-1279-5.

45. Booth R.A. Clinical laboratory costing. Available at: https://www.cadth.ca/sites/default/files/symp-2016/presentations/april12-2016/Concurrent-Session-E3-Ron-Booth.pdf (accessed 23.10.2023).

46. Nosanchuk J.S., Keefner R. Cost analysis of point-of-care laboratory testing in a community hospital. Am J Clin Pathol. 1995; 103 (2): 240– 3. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/103.2.240.

47. Simeon K., Sharma M., Dorward J., et al. Comparative cost analysis of point-of-care versus laboratory-based testing to initiate and monitor HIV treatment in South Africa. PLoS One. 2019; 14 (10): e0223669. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223669.

48. Tsai W.W., Nash D.B., Seamonds B., Weir G.J. Point-of-care versus central laboratory testing: an economic analysis in an academic medical center. Clin Ther. 1994; 16 (5): 898–910.

49. eValuate. Cost per test: driving financial insight. Available at: https://evaluateabc.com/laboratory-cost-management-tool/ (accessed 23.10.2023).

50. PARUS. Calculation of the actual cost of medical services. Available at: https://parus.com/modules/parus-byudzhet/raschet-fakticheskoj-sebestoimosti-medicinskih-uslug/ (in Russ.) (accessed 23.10.2023).

51. Orchard Harvest. A comprehensive LIS designed with lab expertise. Available at: https://www.orchardsoft.com/solutions/orchard-harvest/ (accessed 23.10.2023). 53. Thermo Fisher Scientific. Clinical Testing and Molecular Diagnostics LIMS. Available at: https://www.thermofisher.com/ru/ru/home/digital/solutions/lab-informatics/lims-clinical-testing-molecular-diagnostics. html (accessed 23.10.2023).

52. Apex Healthware. LIS plug-in options. Available at: https://www.apexhealthware.com/LISOptions.aspx (accessed 23.10.2023).

53. SLTE_Test cost analysis. Available at: https://www.smartlabtools.com/test_cost_analysis (accessed 23.10.2023).

54. World Health Organization. Laboratory test costing tool (LTCT). Available at: https://www.who.int/europe/tools-and-toolkits/laboratory-test-costing-tool-(ltct) (accessed 23.10.2023).


What is already known about thе subject?

  • Reviews of methods for calculating the cost of laboratory tests have not previously been published
  • There are several works that provide recommendations on the use of individual methods, considering the authors’ experience

What are the new findings?

  • All methods used today for estimating the cost of laboratory tests were collected and described
  • The methodology used by the Center for Healthcare Quality Assessment and Control for the formation of tariffs of payment for medical care and average standards of financial costs per unit of medical care volume in the State Guarantees Program was presented

How might it impact the clinical practice in the foreseeable future?

  • The presented data will help to improve the efficiency of cost accounting and decision-making in the field of clinical laboratory diagnostics

Review

For citations:


Khayrullin I.I., Omelyanovskiy V.V., Gostishchev R.V., Sukhorukikh O.A., Kovaleva S.A., Gorodetsky B.G. Approaches to determining the cost of laboratory tests. FARMAKOEKONOMIKA. Modern Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmacoepidemiology. 2024;17(2):232-242. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17749/2070-4909/farmakoekonomika.2024.245

Views: 1823


ISSN 2070-4909 (Print)
ISSN 2070-4933 (Online)