Regulatory and legal status of clinical guidelines and their role in the quality control of medical care in countries of the European Union, North America and Asia

Introduction. In 2016-2018, the approaches to the development and use of clinical guidelines in the Russian Federation underwent substantial changes. As part of this work, legal aspects of clinical guidelines were modified. The present review, conducted on behalf of the Ministry of Health, is aimed to analyze the international experience regarding the clinical guidelines standards and identify possible obstacles and risks for their implementation.

Materials and methods. We reviewed documents and publications related to the development and implementation of clinical guidelines in 2016-2017 in 12 countries from Europe, Asia and North America known for their well established health care systems. The search for publications has been conducted with the help of the PubMed bibliographic database and the Google search engine, using the following requests: «clinical practice guidelines legal status», «clinical practice guidelines + name of the country». The results were updated to 2019.

Results. In most of the 12 countries, the clinical guideline development process is coordinated at the national level. However, the implementation of these guidelines by medical professionals is not mandatory, although it is often supported by the regulations of the national health system.

Conclusion. The development and implementation of clinical guidelines in the Russian Federation is consistent with the international experience: the development of clinical guidelines is coordinated at the federal level in agreement with the principles of evidence-based medicine; the implementation of guidelines are not mandatory, however, medical organizations and health professionals are expected to provide the medical care by considering the clinical guidelines, approved by the Scientific and Practical Council of the Ministry of Health.

1. Kovaleva M.Yu., Sukhorukikh O. A. Clinical recommendations. History of creation and development in the Russian Federation and abroad. Remedium. Zhurnal o rynke lekarstv i meditsinskoi tekhniki (in Russ.). 2019; (1-2): 6-14.

2. Dudley R. R. M. Pay for performance: a decision guide for purchasers. Washington, DC Dep. Heal. Hum. Serv. Agency Healthc. Res. Qual. 2006.

3. Federal Law of December 25, 2018 No. 489-ФЗ “On Amendments to Article 40 of the Federal Law“ On Compulsory Medical Insurance in the Russian Federation ”and the Federal Law“ On the Basics of Protecting Citizens’ Health in the Russian Federation ”on Clinical Recommendations” (in Russ.).

4. Federal Law “On the Basics of Protecting Citizens’ Health in the Russian Federation” dated November 21, 2011, No. 323-ФЗ.

5. Order of the Ministry of Health of Russia dated 10.05.2017 N 203n “On the approval of criteria for assessing the quality of medical care” (Registered in the Ministry of Justice of Russia on 05.17.2017 N 46740). The official Internet portal of legal information. [Electronic resource]. URL: http://www.pravo.gov.ru/ Accessed: 17.05.2017.

6. Legido-Quigley H. et al. Clinical guidelines for chronic conditions in the European Union. – European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, 2013.

7. World Health Organization et al. Evaluating quality strategies in Asia-Pacific countries: survey results. 2015.

8. Hurwitz B. Clinical Guidelines and the Law: Negligence, Discretion, and Judgement. 2018.

9. Center for Justice & Democracy. Clinical practice guidelines as legal standards – the wrong cure for health care. [Electronic resource] URL: https://centerjd.org/system/files/PracticeGuidelinesFactSheetF2. pdf. Accessed: 16.08.2019.

10. Hurwitz B. How does evidence based guidance influence determinations of medical negligence? BMJ. 2004; 329 (7473): 1024-1028.

11. Petzold T. et al. Quality Measurement Recommendations Relevant to Clinical Guidelines in Germany and the United Kingdom: (What) Can We Learn From Each Other? Inquiry: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing. 2018; 55. DOI: 10.1177/0046958018761495.

12. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. NICE guidance [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.nice.org.uk/ guidance. Accessed: 16.08.2019.

13. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. OECD Reviews of Health Care Quality: Sweden 2013.

14. Nothacker M., Muche-Borowski C., & Kopp I. B. 20 Jahre ärztliche Leitlinien in Deutschland – was haben sie bewirkt? Zeitschrift Für Evidenz. Fortbildung Und Qualität Im Gesundheitswesen. 2014; 108 (10): 550-559.

15. Samanta A., Samanta J., Gunn M. Legal considerations of clinical guidelines: will NICE make a difference? Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 2003; 96 (3): 133-138.

16. Legal Information Institute. § 438.236 Practice guidelines. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/ text/42/438.236. Accessed: 16.08.2019.

17. Lim M. K. Quest for quality care and patient safety: the case of Singapore. BMJ Quality & Safety. 2004; 13 (1): 71-75.

18. Chen Y. et al. Clinical practice guidelines in China. BMJ. 2018; 360: j5158.