Опыт использования телемедицинских технологий в системах здравоохранения зарубежных стран и Российской Федерации: систематический обзор

Актуальность. На сегодняшний день развитие и широкое внедрение цифровых технологий в медицине рассматривается как один из перспективных механизмов оптимизации затрат, способов повышения эффективности здравоохранения и качества жизни «стареющего общества».
Цель: изучить опыт использования телемедицинских технологий для оказания медицинской помощи в системах здравоохранения разных стран, включая Российскую Федерацию.
Материал и методы. Для получения необходимой информации проведен обзор наиболее релевантных исследований, опубликованных в электронных базах Medscape, РubMed/MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, Scopus, eLibrary, КиберЛенинка, банке документов Всемирной организации здравоохранения и отобранных путем поиска в системах Yandex и Google, а также регламентирующих данное направление нормативных документов.
Результаты. Опыт использования телемедицинских технологий для оказания медицинской помощи в системах здравоохранения разных стран, в т.ч. России, представленный в статье, демонстрирует как преимущества данных технологий, так и ограничения, влияющие на активность их применения в сфере здравоохранения.
Заключение. При всей неоспоримой перспективности телемедицинских технологий их развитие не должно становиться самоцелью. К целесообразности их использования в каждом конкретном случае необходимо подходить индивидуально и исключительно как к еще одному, дополнительному инструменту для повышения качества и доступности медицинской помощи.

1. Андреев Е.М., Варшавская Е.Я., Васин С.А. и др. Демографические вызовы России. Экспертно-аналитический доклад. Центр стратегических разработок. Москва, ноябрь 2017 г. URL: https://www.csr.ru/upload/iblock/704/704bb820549b28a50039d37b02efccd9.pdf (дата обращения 15.01.2021).

2. Haux R., Hein A., Kolb G., et al. Information and communication technologies for promoting and sustaining quality of life, health and self-sufficiency in ageing societies – outcomes of the Lower Saxony Research Network Design of Environments for Ageing (GAL). Inform Health Soc Care. 39 (3-4): 166–87. https://doi.org/10.3109/17538157.2014.931849.

3. Bujnowska-Fedak M.M., Grata-Borkowska U. Use of telemedicinebased care for the aging and elderly: promises and pitfalls. Smart Homecare Technol Telehealth. 2015; 2015 (3): 91–105. https://doi.org/10.2147/SHTT.S59498.

4. Ku L. Eleven remote patient monitoring companies you should know about. URL: https://www.plugandplaytechcenter.com/resources/10-remote-patient-monitoring-companies-you-should-know-about/ (дата обращения 12.01.2021).

5. Clark P.A., Capuzzi K., Harrison J. Telemedicine: medical, legal and ethical perspectives. Med Sci Monit. 2010; 16 (12): RA261–72.

6. Combi C., Pozzani G., Pozzi G. Telemedicine for developing countries: a survey and some design issues. App Clin Inform. 2016; 7 (4): 1025– 50. https://doi.org/10.4338/ACI-2016-06-R-0089.

7. Телемедицина: как дистанционное консультирование расширяет возможности пациента. URL: https://sberhealth.style.rbc.ru/?utm_source=rbc&utm_medium=main&utm_campaign=sbrzdr20f-rmulighet-m (дата обращения 21.01.2021).

8. Medscape. Telemedicine: can it help your practice? Making video visits successful for you and your patients. URL: https://www.medscape.com/courses/business/100021 (дата обращения 15.01.2021).

9. de la Torre-Díez I., López-Coronado M., Vaca C., et al. Cost-utility and cost-effectiveness studies of telemedicine, electronic, and mobile health systems in the literature: a systematic review. Telemed J E Health. 2015; 21 (2): 81–5. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2014.0053.

10. Pollock K., Setzen M., Svider P.F. Embracing telemedicine into your otolaryngology practice amid the COVID-19 crisis: an invited commentary. Am J Otolaryngol. 2020; 41 (3): 102490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102490.

11. Всемирная организация здравоохранения. Комплект материалов по национальной стратегии электронного здравоохранения. URL: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/75211/9789241548465_rus.pdf?sequence=9 (дата обращения 24.12.2020).

12. World Health Organization. Telemedicine: opportunities and developments in Member States: report on the second global survey on eHealth. URL: https://www.who.int/goe/publications/goe_telemedicine_2010.pdf (дата обращения 24.12.2020).

13. American telemedicine Association. What is telemedicine? URL: https://web.archive.org/web/20130508215350/http://www.americantelemed.org/learn/what-is-telemedicine (дата обращения 21.01.2021).

14. Fadahunsi K.P., Akinlua J.T., O’Connor S., et al. Protocol for a systematic review and qualitative synthesis of information quality frameworks in eHealth. BMJ Open. 2019; 9 (3): e024722. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024722.

15. Woo K., Dowding D.W. Decision-making factors associated with telehealth adoption by patients with heart failure at home: a qualitative study. Comput Inform Nurs. 2020; 38 (4): 204–14. https://doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000000589.

16. Bujnowska-Fedak M., Siejka D., Sapilak B.J. Telemedicine support systems in patients with chronic diseases. J Family Med Prim Care. 2010; 12 (2): 328–34.

17. Craig J., Patterson V. Introduction to the practice of telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare. 2005; 11 (1): 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X0501100102.

18. Ким Д., Аланази Х., Даим Т. Перспективы распространения телемедицины: прогностическое моделирование на примере сельских районов США. Форсайт. 2015; 9 (4): 32–41. https://doi.org/10.17323/1995-459x.2015.4.32.41.

19. Hoek P.D., Schers H.J., Bronkhorst E.M., et al. The effect of weekly specialist palliative care teleconsultations in patients with advanced cancer – a randomized clinical trial. BMC Med. 2017; 15 (1): 119. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-017-0866-9.

20. Crispo A., Montagnese C., Perri F., et al. COVID-19 emergency and post-emergency in Italian cancer patients: how can patients be assisted? Front Oncol. 2020; 10: 1571. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.01571.

21. O'Reilly D., Carroll H., Lucas M., et al. Virtual oncology clinics during the COVID-19 pandemic. Ir J Med Sci. 2021; 190 (4): 1295–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-020-02489-9.

22. Hortobagyi G.N. A shortage of oncologists? The American Society of Clinical Oncology workforce study. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25 (12): 1468–9. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.10.9397.

23. Cox A., Lucas G., Marcu A., et al. Cancer survivors' experience with telehealth: a systematic review and thematic synthesis. J Med Internet Res. 2017; 19 (1): e11. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6575.

24. Телемедицина в лечении онкологических заболеваний (по материалам доклада S. Joseph Sirintrapun и Ana Maria Lopez на конгрессе ASCO 2018). URL: https://rosoncoweb.ru/news/oncology/2018/09/13-2/ (дата обращения 12.01.2021).

25. American Cancer Society. Project ECHO (Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes). URL: https://www.accc-cancer.org/projects/acs-echo-project/overview (дата обращения 20.02.2021).

26. Arora S., Thornton K., Murata G., et al. Outcomes of treatment for hepatitis C virus infection by primary care providers. New Engl J Med. 2011; 364 (23): 2199–207. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1009370.

27. Gopu G., Anitha T., Nagarajapandian M., Prabhakaran M. Telemedicine Technologies. Academic Press; 2019: 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816948-3.00004-0.

28. Kuehn B.M. Telemedicine helps cardiologists extend their reach. Circulation. 2016; 134 (16): 1189–91. https://doi.org/10.1161/ CIRCULATIONAHA.116.025282.

29. Khetrapal A. What is teleradiology? URL: https://www.news-medical.net/health/What-is-Teleradiology.aspx (дата обращения 20.02.2021).

30. Gidde P.S., Prasad S.S., Singh A.P., et al. Validation of expert system enhanced deep learning algorithm for automated screening for COVID-Pneumonia on chest X-rays. Sci Rep. 2021; 11 (1): 23210. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-02003-w.

31. Weinstein R.S., Graham A.R., Richter L.C., et al. Overview of telepathology, virtual microscopy, and whole slide imaging: prospects for the future. Hum Pathol. 2009; 40 (8): 1057–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2009.04.006.

32. Nordrum I., Engum B., Rinde E., et al. Remote frozen section service: a telepathology project in northern Norway. Hum Pathol. 1991; 22 (6): 514–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0046-8177(91)90226-f.

33. Chong T., Palma-Diaz M.F., Fisher C., et al. The California Telepathology Service: UCLA's experience in deploying a regional digital pathology subspecialty consultation network. J Pathol Inform. 2019; 10: 31. https://doi.org/10.4103/jpi.jpi_22_19.

34. Velasquez S.E., Chaves-Carballo E., Nelson E.L. Pediatric teleneurology: a model of epilepsy care for rural populations. Pediatr Neurol. 2016; 64: 32–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2016.08.001.

35. Larner A.J. Teleneurology: an overview of current status. Pract Neurol. 2011; 11 (5): 283–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/practneurol-2011-000090.

36. Morse S.S., Murugiah M.K., Soh Y.C., et al. Mobile health applications for pediatric care: review and comparison. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2018; 52 (3): 383–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/2168479017725557.

37. Gillberg N., Wentz E. Internet-based support and coaching for adolescents and young adults with neuropsychiatric disorders – the implementation of an intervention from an organizational perspective. Health. 2017; 9 (1): 69–87. https://doi.org/10.4236/health.2017.91006.

38. Valentine A.Z., Hall S.S., Young E., et al. Implementation of telehealth services to assess, monitor, and treat neurodevelopmental disorders: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2021; 23 (1): e22619. https://doi.org/10.2196/22619.

39. Davis L.E., Coleman J., Harnar J., King M.K. Teleneurology: successful delivery of chronic neurologic care to 354 patients living remotely in a rural state. Telemed J E Health. 2014; 20 (5): 473–7 https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2013.0217.

40. Ben-Pazi H., Browne P., Chan P., et al. Perspectives on telemedicine in motor disorders: an interdisciplinary approach. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2018; 18 (5): 26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-018-0834-6.

41. Beck C.A., Beran D.B., Biglan K.M., et al. National randomized controlled trial of virtual house calls for Parkinson disease. Neurology. 2017; 89 (11): 1152–61. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000004357.

42. Dorsey E.R., Glidden A.M., Holloway M.R., et al. Teleneurology and mobile technologies: the future of neurological care. Nat Rev Neurol. 2018; 14 (5): 285–97. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2018.31.

43. Wadsworth H.E., Galusha-Glasscock J.M., Womack K.B., et al. Remote neuropsychological assessment in rural American Indians with and without cognitive impairment. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2016; 31 (5): 420–5. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acw030.

44. Turnbull Q., Wolf A., Holroyd S. Attitudes of elderly subjects toward “truth telling” for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2003; 16 (2): 90–3. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891988703016002005.

45. Mansour O., Tajanlangit M., Heyward J., et al. Telemedicine and office-based care for behavioral and psychiatric conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. Ann Intern Med. 2020; Nov. 17: M20-6243. https://doi.org/10.7326/M20-6243.

46. Telemedizin: Besondere Herausforderung für den Datenschutz. November 2020. URL: https://www.datenschutz.org/telemedizin/#gesetzliche-grundlage-der-telemedizin-in-deutschland (на нем. яз.) (дата обращения 20.02.2021).

47. Nobis S., Lehr D., Ebert D.D. E-Mental-Health – am Beispiel von internetbasierten Gesundheitsinterventionen. В кн.: Müller-Mielitz S., Lux T. (ред.) E-Health-Ökonomie. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden; 2017: 723–37 (на нем. яз.). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-10788-8.

48. Pinar U., Anract J., Perrot O., et al. Preliminary assessment of patient and physician satisfaction with the use of teleconsultation in urology during the COVID-19 pandemic. World J Urol. 2020; Sep. 9: 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03432-4.

49. Haddad S.M., Souza R.T., Cecatti J.G. Mobile technology in health (mHealth) and antenatal care – searching for apps and available solutions: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2019; 127: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.04.008.

50. Jelnes R. Telemedicine in the management of patients with chronic wounds. J Wound Care. 2011; 20 (4): 187–90. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2011.20.4.187.

51. Biofourmis launches hospital-at-home solution nationwide. URL: https://medcitynews.com/2020/12/brigham-and-womens-biofourmislaunch-hospital-at-home-solution-nationwide/?rf=1 (дата обращения 20.02.2021).

52. Levine D.M., Ouchi K., Blanchfield B., et al. Hospital-level care at home for acutely ill adults: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2020; 172 (2): 77–85. https://doi.org/10.7326/M19-0600.

53. Ryan Haight Act will require tighter restrictions on internet pharmacies. URL: https://www.govtech.com/health/Ryan-Haight-Actwill.html (дата обращения 20.02.2021).

54. Øyen K.R., Sunde O.S., Solheim M., et al. Understanding attitudes toward information and communication technology in home-care: information and communication technology as a market good within Norwegian welfare services. Inform Health Soc Care. 2018; 43 (3): 300– 9. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538157.2017.1297814.

55. Wootton R. Twenty years of telemedicine in chronic disease management – an evidence synthesis. J Telemed Telecare. 2012; 18 (4): 211–20. https://doi.org/10.1258/jtt.2012.120219.

56. Farmer A., Gibson O.J., Tarassenko L., Neil A. A systematic review of telemedicine interventions to support blood glucose self-monitoring in diabetes. Diabet Med. 2005; 22 (10): 1372–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2005.01627.x.

57. Marcolino M.S., Maia J.X., Alkmim M.B., et al. Telemedicine application in the care of diabetes patients: systematic review and metaanalysis. PLoS One. 2013; 8 (11): е79246. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079246.

58. Bujnowska-Fedak M.M., Puchała E., Steciwko A. The impact of telehome care on health status and quality of life among patients with diabetes in a primary care setting in Poland. Telemed J E Health. 2011; 17 (3): 153–63. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2010.0113.

59. Franc S. Telemedicine and diabetes. В кн.: Reznik Y. (ред.) Handbook of diabetes technology. Springer, Cham.; 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98119-2_9.

60. O’Gorman L.D., Hogenbirk J. Driving distance to telemedicine units in Northern Ontario as a measure of potential access to healthcare. Telemed J E Health. 2016; 22 (4): 269–75. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2015.0133.

61. Cook E.J., Randhawa G., Sharp C., et al. Exploring the factors that influence the decision to adopt and engage with an integrated assistive telehealth and telecare service in Cambridgeshire, UK: a nested qualitative study of patient ‘users’ and ‘non-users’. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016; 16: 137. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1379-5.

62. Gorst S.L., Armitage C., Hawley M., Coates E. Exploring patient beliefs and perceptions about sustained use of telehealth. Intern J Integr Care. 2013; 13 (7). https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.1393.

63. Polisena J., Tran K., Cimon K., et al. Home telehealth for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Telemed Telecare. 2010; 16 (3): 120–7. https://doi.org/10.1258/jtt.2009.090812.

64. Greenhalgh T., Procter R., Wherton J., et al. What is quality in assisted living technology? The ARCHIE framework for effective telehealth and telecare services. BMC Med. 2015; 13: 91. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0279-6.

65. Vergouw J.W., Smits-Pelser H., Kars M.C., et al. Barriers and facilitators of older adults towards eHealth in general practice: a qualitative study. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2020; 21: e54. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423620000547.

66. Goins R.T., Williams K.A., Carter M.W., et al. Perceived barriers to health care access among rural older adults: a qualitative study. J Rural Health.2005; 21 (3): 206–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-0361.2005.tb00084.x.

67. Приказ Минздрава России от 19.03.2020 г. № 198н «О временном порядке организации работы медицинских организаций в целях реализации мер по профилактике и снижению рисков распространения новой коронавирусной инфекции COVID-19». URL: https://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/73669697/ (дата обращения 20.02.2021).

68. Приказ Департамента здравоохранения г. Москвы от 06.04.2020 г. № 356 «О применении телемедицинских технологий при организации оказания консультаций по вопросам коронавирусной инфекции COVID-19 и подборе персонала в медицинские организации города Москвы». URL: https://www.mos.ru/dzdrav/documents/departmentacts/view/239552220/ (дата обращения 20.02.2021).

69. Московские эксперты о телемедицине. URL: https://evercare.ru/news/moskovskie-eksperty-o-telemedicine (дата обращения 20.02.2021).

70. Базина О.О., Сименюра С.С. Телемедицина: достоинства, недостатки, реалии (правовой анализ и практическое применение). Медицинское право. 2020; 3: 32–8.

71. Владзимирский А.В. Эффективность телемедицинских консультаций «пациент–врач»: status praesens. Российский журнал телемедицины и электронного здравоохранения. 2018; 3. https://doi.org/10.29188/2542-2413-2018-4-3-64-70.

72. Зингерман Б.В., Шкловский-Корди Н.Е., Воробьев А.И. О телемедицине «пациент–врач». Врач и информационные технологии. 2017; 1: 61–79.

73. Телемедицина: если дорого, то значит не для всех? URL: https://www.garant.ru/article/1111115/ (дата обращения 19.02.2021).

74. Telemedicine Reimbursement Guide. Tips to help you navigate reimbursement. URL: https://evisit.com/resources/telemedicinereimbursement-guide/ (дата обращения 19.02.2021).

75. Jones K. Telemedicine reimbursement. A guide to getting paid. URL: https://business.amwell.com/telemedicine-reimbursement/ (дата обращения 19.02.2021).

76. Haux R., Koch S., Lovell N.H. Health-enabling and ambient assistive technologies: past, present, future. Yearb Med Inform. 2016; 25 (S 01): S76–91. https://doi.org/10.15265/IYS-2016-s008.

77. ФОМС рекомендовал регионам оплачивать телемедицину из подушевого норматива. URL: https://medvestnik.ru/content/news/FOMS-rekomendoval-regionam-oplachivat-telemedicinu-izpodushevogo-normativa.html (дата обращения 19.02.2021).