<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">farmaec</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">FARMAKOEKONOMIKA. Modern Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmacoepidemiology</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>ФАРМАКОЭКОНОМИКА. Современная фармакоэкономика и фармакоэпидемиология</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2070-4909</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2070-4933</issn><publisher><publisher-name>IRBIS LLC</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17749/2070-4909.2019.12.2.86-90</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">farmaec-290</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ORIGINAL ARTICLES</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ОРИГИНАЛЬНЫЕ ПУБЛИКАЦИИ</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Recent changes in the pharmacovigilance system in the Russian Federation and the EAEU</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Актуальные изменения в системе фармаконадзора в России и ЕАЭС</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7324-8996</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Гильдеева</surname><given-names>Г. Н.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Gildeeva</surname><given-names>G. N.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Гильдеева Гелия Нязыфовна - доктор фармакологических наук, профессор кафедры организации и управления в сфере обращения лекарственных средств в ИПО.</p><p>Ул. Трубецкая, д. 8, стр. 2, Москва 119048</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Geliya N. Gildeeva - PhD, Professor at the Department of Organization and Management of Drug Circulation.</p><p>8-2 Trubetskaya Str., Moscow 119048</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2537-2850</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Белостоцкий</surname><given-names>А. В.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Belostotsky</surname><given-names>A. V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Белостоцкий Андрей Викторович - доктор медицинских наук, заведующий кафедрой организации и управления в сфере обращения лекарственных средств в ИПО.</p><p>Ул. Трубецкая, д. 8, стр. 2, Москва 119048</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Andrey V. Belostotsky - MD, PhD, Head of the Department of Organization and Management of Drugs Circulation.</p><p>8-2 Trubetskaya Str., Moscow 119048</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">yurkovv@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru">Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования Первый Московский государственный медицинский университет имени И.М. Сеченова Министерства здравоохранения Российской Федерации (Сеченовский Университет)<country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en">Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University<country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2019</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>17</day><month>07</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>86</fpage><lpage>90</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Gildeeva G.N., Belostotsky A.V., 2019</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2019</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Гильдеева Г.Н., Белостоцкий А.В.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Gildeeva G.N., Belostotsky A.V.</copyright-holder><license license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.pharmacoeconomics.ru/jour/article/view/290">https://www.pharmacoeconomics.ru/jour/article/view/290</self-uri><abstract><p>The Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) is an international organization for regional economic integration, established by the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union, which currently includes 5 countries - Russia, Kazakhstan, Belarus, Armenia and Kyrgyzstan. The EAEU ensures the freedom of goods movement, as well as services, capital and labor, conducting a coordinated, agreed/unified economic policy. The current practice of pharmacovigilance in the EAEU is of interest to potential foreign investors and market players.</p><p>The aim of this study was to analyze the recent changes in pharmacovigilance in the EAEU countries in order to adopt the strategy of the pharmaceutical industry players.</p><sec><title>Materials and methods</title><p>Materials and methods. The regulatory base of pharmacovigilance in the EAEU countries and the unified EAEU provisions on adverse reactions (ADR) were analyzed. A critical analysis of the current periodic safety update reports (PSUR) and risk management plans (RMP) was also carried out.</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>Results. The united EAEU drug market is a complex system that incorporates 35 regulations, including the variety of good practice guidelines regarding the circulation of medicinal products (GMP, GCP, GLP, GDP, and GVP). This group of regulations contains basic documents on the inspection of production lines, the assessment of generic equivalence, the development of biological drugs, and the pharmacovigilance (PV). Currently, the ADR reporting in the EAEU countries is at a level lower than that in Russia. The common EAEU database of identified ADRs has been already initiated, but the number of incoming signals is quite small. The most common flaws of the PSUR are the late reports, the incorrect format and contents of those; the inconsistent information about the product, different from that of Roszdravnadzor, the discrepancy between the Patients information leaflet (“Instruction for medical use”) and the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC), and the lack of important and relevant scientific and clinical information. In the EAEU, the submission of Risk Management Plan (RMP) as part of the registration dossier is required for any new medication (New Chemical Entity), including a new combination of drugs. The present article also covers other updates in the Pharmacovigilance system, regulated by the Good Pharmacovigilance practice, which entered into effect on 01.01.2017, as well as the updated tasks for harmonization within the EAEU.</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusions</title><p>Conclusions. The medicinal products circulating in the EAEU have to be checked for their efficacy and safety in order to identify possible negative consequences and/or individual patient intolerance. This information will serve to warn the medical staff and patients, veterinary specialists and animal owners about potential hazards of using these products. In the near future, the Eurasian Union plans to launch a “sanitation” campaign in the pharmaceutical market and get rid of low-effective and unsafe drugs. In this respect, the issues of pharmacovigilance become particularly relevant.</p></sec></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Евразийский экономический союз (ЕАЭС) - международная организация региональной экономической интеграции, учрежденная Договором о Евразийском экономическом союзе, в которую на текущий момент входят пять стран - Россия, Казахстан, Белоруссия, Армения и Киргизия. В ЕАЭС обеспечивается свобода движения товаров, а также услуг, капитала и рабочей силы, проведение скоординированной, согласованной или единой политики в отраслях экономики. Прежде всего для иностранных игроков рынка представляет интерес анализ существующей практики фармаконадзора, что определяет цель данной работы.</p><p>Цель - анализ изменений в системе фармаконадзора в России и ЕАЭС для адаптации стратегии игроков фармацевтической индустрии.</p><sec><title>Материалы и методы</title><p>Материалы и методы. Проанализирована нормативная база фармаконадзора в странах, входящих в ЕАЭС, единая база ЕАЭС по нежелательным реакциям (НР). Проведен критический анализ сложившейся практики периодических отчетов по безопасности лекарственного средства (ПООБ), планов управления рисками (ПУР).</p></sec><sec><title>Результаты</title><p>Результаты. Общий лекарственный рынок ЕАЭС представляет собой сложную систему из 35 нормативных актов, которые включают надлежащие практики по обращению лекарственных средств (GMP, GCP, GLP, GDP, GVP). Эти нормативные документы определяют порядок инспектирования производств, подтверждение эквивалентности воспроизведенных лекарств, разработку биологических лекарственных препаратов и фармаконадзор (ФН). В странах ЕАЭС репортирование НР находится на более низком уровне, чем в России. Единая информационная база ЕАЭС данных по выявленным НР на ЛС уже начала свою работу, но количество поступивших в нее сигналов пока незначительно. Наиболее частые ошибки в ПООБ: несоответствие сроков; формы; содержания разделов; отличия информации об ЛС от таковой, полученной Росздравнадзором; отличия информации в инструкции по медицинскому применению от таковой в документе «Справочная информация по безопасности»; отсутствие важной и актуальной информации научно-клинического характера. Подача ПУР необходима в составе регистрационного досье на любой ранее незарегистрированный в ЕАЭС лекарственный препарат, в т. ч. ранее незарегистрированной комбинации. В работе приведены также другие нововведения в системе ФН, регламентированные Правилами надлежащей практики ФН, вступившими в силу 01.01.2017 г., а также актуальные задачи для гармонизации в рамках ЕАЭС на ближайшую перспективу.</p></sec><sec><title>Заключение</title><p>Заключение. Все находящиеся в обращении в ЕАЭС лекарственные препараты должны подвергаться мониторингу эффективности и безопасности для выявления возможных нежелательных последствий их применения, индивидуальной непереносимости, предупреждения медицинских работников и пациентов, а также их защиты от применения подобных лекарственных препаратов. В ближайшее время ожидается «санация» фармацевтического рынка, с которого исчезнут препараты, не подтвердившие свою эффективность, а также препараты с неблагоприятным профилем безопасности, в связи с чем вопросы, связанные с ФН, имеют особую актуальность.</p></sec></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>фармаконадзор</kwd><kwd>ФН</kwd><kwd>Евразийский экономический союз</kwd><kwd>ЕАЭС</kwd><kwd>нежелательные реакции</kwd><kwd>НР</kwd><kwd>периодический отчет по безопасности лекарственного средства</kwd><kwd>ПООБ</kwd><kwd>план управления рисками</kwd><kwd>ПУР</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>pharmacovigilance</kwd><kwd>PV</kwd><kwd>Eurasian Economic Union</kwd><kwd>EAEU</kwd><kwd>adverse reactions</kwd><kwd>ADR</kwd><kwd>Periodic safety update report</kwd><kwd>PSUR</kwd><kwd>Risk management plan</kwd><kwd>RMP</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lindquist M. Vigibase, the WHO Global ICSR database system: basic facts. Drug Inf J. 2008; 42 (5): 409-419.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lindquist M. Vigibase, the WHO Global ICSR database system: basic facts. Drug Inf J. 2008; 42 (5): 409-419.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Inacio P., Cavaco A., Airaksinen M. The value of patient reporting to the pharmacovigilance system: a systematic review. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017; 83 (2): 227-246.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Inacio P., Cavaco A., Airaksinen M. The value of patient reporting to the pharmacovigilance system: a systematic review. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017; 83 (2): 227-246.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Shankar P.R. VigiAccess: Promoting public access to VigiBase. Indian J Pharmacol. 2016 Sep-Oct; 48 (5): 606-607.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shankar P.R. VigiAccess: Promoting public access to VigiBase. Indian J Pharmacol. 2016 Sep-Oct; 48 (5): 606-607.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Raimond L. Pharmacovigilance Requirements in Russia and Kazakhstan. Die pharmazeutische Industrie. 2017; 79 (12): 1681-1685.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Raimond L. Pharmacovigilance Requirements in Russia and Kazakhstan. Die pharmazeutische Industrie. 2017; 79 (12): 1681-1685.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Khoseva E.N., Morozova Т.Е. Problematic aspects of the development of the pharmacovigilance system in the Russian Federation at the current stage (overview). Good Clinical Practice. 2013; 2: 40-45.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Khoseva E.N., Morozova Т.Е. Problematic aspects of the development of the pharmacovigilance system in the Russian Federation at the current stage (overview). Good Clinical Practice. 2013; 2: 40-45.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Caduff-Janosa P. Lost in regulation. In: Edwards R, Lindquist M, editors. Pharmacovigilance critiques and ways forward. Berlin: Springer International Publishing. 2017; 9-19.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Caduff-Janosa P. Lost in regulation. In: Edwards R, Lindquist M, editors. Pharmacovigilance critiques and ways forward. Berlin: Springer International Publishing. 2017; 9-19.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Laroche M.-L., Batz A., Geniaux H., Fechant C., Merle L., Maison P. Pharmacovigilance in Europe: place of the Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) in organisation and decisional processes. Pharmacovigilance. 2016; 71: 161-9.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Laroche M.-L., Batz A., Geniaux H., Fechant C., Merle L., Maison P. Pharmacovigilance in Europe: place of the Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) in organisation and decisional processes. Pharmacovigilance. 2016; 71: 161-9.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Khoseva E.N., Morozova T.E. Problems of development of a pharmacovigilance in Russia at the present stage (review). Good clinical practice. 2013; 3: 40-45.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Khoseva E.N., Morozova T.E. Problems of development of a pharmacovigilance in Russia at the present stage (review). Good clinical practice. 2013; 3: 40-45.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gildeeva G., Belostotsky A. Pharmacovigilance in Russia: current state of affairs, challenges, and prospects. Current Medical Research and Opinion. 2017 Dec; 33 (12): 2161-2166.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gildeeva G., Belostotsky A. Pharmacovigilance in Russia: current state of affairs, challenges, and prospects. Current Medical Research and Opinion. 2017 Dec; 33 (12): 2161-2166.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Glagolev S.V., Olefir Yu.V., Romanov B.K., Alyautdin R.N. Guidelines for the planning and implementing of pharmacovigilance systems audit. Safety and Risk of Pharmacotherapy. 2016; 3: 5-13.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Glagolev S.V., Olefir Yu.V., Romanov B.K., Alyautdin R.N. Guidelines for the planning and implementing of pharmacovigilance systems audit. Safety and Risk of Pharmacotherapy. 2016; 3: 5-13.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gildeeva G.N., Glagolev S.V., Yurkov V.I. Problems of drug safety monitoring in Russia: role of pharmacovigilance experts. Vestnik Roszdravnadzora - Bulletin of Roszdravnadzor (in Russ.). 2016; (5):114-8.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gildeeva G.N., Glagolev S.V., Yurkov V.I. Problems of drug safety monitoring in Russia: role of pharmacovigilance experts. Vestnik Roszdravnadzora - Bulletin of Roszdravnadzor (in Russ.). 2016; (5):114-8.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Khoseva E.N., Morozova T.E., Andrushishina T.B. Safety and Efficacy of Today’s Remedies from Patients’ Viewpoint. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012; 21: 30-34.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Khoseva E.N., Morozova T.E., Andrushishina T.B. Safety and Efficacy of Today’s Remedies from Patients’ Viewpoint. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012; 21: 30-34.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Campbell J.E., Gossell-Williams M., Lee M.G. A Review of Pharmacovigilance. West Indian Med J. 2014; Dec; 63 (7): 771-774.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Campbell J.E., Gossell-Williams M., Lee M.G. A Review of Pharmacovigilance. West Indian Med J. 2014; Dec; 63 (7): 771-774.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rocca E. Bridging the boundaries between scientists and clinicians: mechanistic hypotheses and patient stories in risk assessment of drugs. J Eval Clin Pract. 2017; 23: 114-20.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rocca E. Bridging the boundaries between scientists and clinicians: mechanistic hypotheses and patient stories in risk assessment of drugs. J Eval Clin Pract. 2017; 23: 114-20.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Houyez F. Connecting regulators and patient organizations. Uppsala Rep. 2018; 79: 17-8.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Houyez F. Connecting regulators and patient organizations. Uppsala Rep. 2018; 79: 17-8.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
